EXPLORING PERCEPTION OF POST GRADUATE STUDENTS TOWARDS VIDEO BASE LEARNING
This study aimed to find out the views of students at the undergraduate level about learning using video-based learning. The method used in this research is classroom action research, and this research was conducted in the Master of Management program, Bina Nusantara University, located in Jakarta. This research was done between the 2019 – 2020 academic year and the Covid-19 pandemic between February 2020 and June 2020. The subjects within the study were first-year students in the second-level program, and of the 25 people in the class, three volunteers participated in this research. The results of this study indicate that the possibility of successful video-based learning and the results obtained have the opportunity to have a positive impact on learning at the second-level level, only with a note that input from participants needs to be considered, including those related to the duration and appearance of video-based learning.
Berk, R. A. (2013). Top five flashpoints in the assessment of teaching effectiveness. Medical Teacher, 35(1), 15–26. https://doi.org/10.3109/0142159X.2012.732247
Brailsford, I. (2010). Motives and aspirations for doctoral study: Career, personal, and inter-personal factors in the decision to Embark on a history PhD. International Journal of Doctoral Studies, 5(October), 15–27. https://doi.org/10.28945/710
Fazey, D. M. A., & Fazey, J. A. (2001). The Potential for Autonomy in Learning: Perceptions of competence, motivation and locus of control in first-year undergraduate students. Studies in Higher Education, 26(3), 345–361. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075070120076309
Felder, R. M. (1993). Reaching the Second Tier--Learning and Teaching Styles in College Science Education. Journal of College Science Teaching, 22(5), 286–290. http://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/detail?accno=EJ473530%5Cnhttp://www.eric.ed.gov/ERICWebPortal/search/recordDetails.jsp?ERICExtSearch_SearchValue_0=EJ473530&searchtype=keyword&ERICExtSearch_SearchType_
Felder, Richard M.; Brent, R. (2005). Understanding Student Differences. Journal of Engineering Education, 57–72.
Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online, 2(9), 2319–7722. www.ijhssi.org
Hartel, R.W.; Foegeding, E. . (2004). Learning: Objectives, Competencies, or Outcomes? Journal of Food Science Education, 3.
Parr, J. M., & Timperley, H. S. (2010). Feedback to writing, assessment for teaching and learning and student progress. Assessing Writing, 15(2), 68–85. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.asw.2010.05.004Ganyaupfu, E. M. (2013). Teaching Methods and Students’ Academic Performance. International Journal of Humanities and Social Science Invention ISSN (Online, 2(9), 2319–7722. www.ijhssi.org
Richardson, V. (1994). Conducting Research on Practice. Educational Researcher, 23(5), 5–10. https://doi.org/10.3102/0013189X023005005
Santagata, R. (2009). Designing video-based professional development for mathematics teachers in low-performing schools. Journal of Teacher Education, 60(1), 38–51. https://doi.org/10.1177/0022487108328485
Yousef, A. M. F., Chatti, M. A., Schroeder, U., Wosnitza, M., Santagata, R., Issues, I., & Trade, G. (2015). Research topics all publications methods short reads tools & resources experts abo. International Review of Research in Open and Distance Learning, 60(2), 1–20. https://doi.org/10.19173/irrodl.v16i2.2032