EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI DI SMAN 10 KOTA BENGKULU MENGGUNAKAN MODEL COUNTENANCE STAKE

  • Alwina Sucita IAIN Bengkulu
  • Dinda Lestari IAIN Bengkulu
  • Fopy Angraini IAIN Bengkulu
  • Siska Selpiyanti IAIN Bengkulu
  • Ahmad Walid IAIN Bengkulu
Keywords: Evaluation of learning;, Countenance Stake;, Learning Biology

Abstract

Evaluation of Biology Learning at SMAN 10 Bengkulu City Using the Countenance Stake Model. In the world of education, learning evaluation is a process to determine the value of learning and learning implemented, through assessment and / or measurement of learning and learning activities. This study aims to evaluate the Biology learning at SMAN 10 Bengkulu City based on the Regulation of the Minister of Education and Culture of the Republic of Indonesia Number 65 of 2013 concerning Basic and Secondary Education Process Standards. This research is an evaluation research using the Countenace Stake model. Data collection using techniques, observation, interviews and documentation. The analysis technique used is descriptive qualitative. The conclusions of the results of the study are as follows: (1) Biology learning planning is included in the sufficient category (70%), it is found that there is no conformity between the lesson plan and the standard of the learning process; (2) the implementation of Biology learning is included in the sufficient category (58%), there is no conformity between the implementation of learning with the standard implementation of learning processes; and (3) student learning outcomes have not met the Minimum Mastery Criteria (KKM) with an actuality of achievement of 65% sufficient category. 4) there is a contingency between planning, implementation and learning outcomes of science, which planning learning with enough categories causes the teacher to carry out learning not in accordance with the standard processes so that the learning outcomes of students do not meet the KKM.

References

Arikunto, S. (2008). Evaluasi program pendidikan (2rded). Jakarta: PT.Bumi Aksara. Depdikbud

Davis, Keith. Newstrom, John. (2008). Perilaku Dalam Organisasi. Jakarta: Erlangga

Hamm, R.W. (1985). A Systematic evaluation of an environmental invertigation course. (Doctoral dissertation.Georgia State University). ERIC Document. Reproduction Service No ED-256-622.

Kaufman, R., & Thomas, S. (1980). Evaluation without fear. New York London: New Viewpoints

Kementerian Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. (2013). Peraturan menteri pendidikan dan kebudayaan no. 65 tahun 2013 tentang Standar Proses. Jakarta: BSNP.

Pembelajaran, Pengajaran, dan Asesmen Revisi Taksonomi Pendidikan Bloom. Terjemahan Agung Prihantoro. Yogyakarta :Pustaka Belajar

Provus, M., Malcolm. (1969). The discrepancy evaluation models. An approach to local program improvement and development. Pitaburgh Public School.

Stake, R E. (1977). The Countenance of educational evaluation.In A.A. Bellack & H.M Kliebard. Eds 1. Curriculum and evaluation (pp. 372-390).Berkeley.CA McCutehan.

Stake, Robert E, 1967. Center for Instructional Research and Curriculum Evaluation University of Illinois. The Coutenance Of Educational Evaluation (1-12)

Walid,A., Putra, E. P., & Asiyah, A. (2019). Pembelajaran Biologi Menggunakan Program Solving Disertai Diagrag Tree Untuk Memberdayakan Kemampuan Berpikir Logis Dan Kemampuan Menafsirkan Siswa. IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal Of Integrated Science Education, 1(1), 1-6

Winaryati. E., Suyata, & Sumarno. (2013). Model evaluasi dalam supervisi pembelajaran IPA berbasis lima domain sains. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan. Vol. 17, No. 2, (pp.241258).

Wiyoko, T. (2019). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis Mahasiswa PGSD Dengan Graded Responses Models Pada Pembelajaran IPA. IJIS Edu: Indonesian Journal Of Integrated Science Education, 2019, 1(1), 25-32

Wiyoko, T., & Aprizan,A. (2020). Analisis Profil Kemampuan Kognitif Mahasiswa PGSD Pada Mata Kuliah Ilmu Alamiah Dasar. IJIS Edu : Indonesian J. Integr. Sci. Education, 2(1), 2020, 2(1), 28–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.29300/ijisedu.v2i1.2384

Ilmu Alamiah Dasar Wood, B.B. (2001). Stake’s Countenance Model: Evaluating an Enveronmental Education Proffesional Development Course. The Journal of Environmental Education, Vol.32, No.2, pp. 18-27.

Published
2020-06-03
How to Cite
Sucita, A., Lestari, D., Angraini, F., Selpiyanti, S., & Walid, A. (2020). EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN BIOLOGI DI SMAN 10 KOTA BENGKULU MENGGUNAKAN MODEL COUNTENANCE STAKE. Jurnal Muara Pendidikan, 5(1), 488-498. Retrieved from http://ejournal.stkip-mmb.ac.id/index.php/mp/article/view/200